Everything about Nagarjuna totally explained
Acharya Nāgārjuna (
Telugu: నాగార్జున;
Chinese: 龍樹;
Tibetan:
Klu Sgrub) (c.
150 -
250 CE) was an
Indian philosopher, the founder of the
Madhyamaka (Middle Path) school of
Mahāyāna Buddhism, and arguably the most influential Buddhist thinker after
Gautama Buddha himself.
His writings were the basis for the formation of the Madhyamaka (Middle Way) school, which was transmitted to China under the name of the Three Treatise (
Sanlun) School. He is credited with developing the philosophy of the
Prajnaparamita sutras, and was closely associated with the Buddhist university of
Nalanda. In the
Jodo Shinshu branch of Buddhism, he's considered the First
Patriarch.
Little is known about the actual life of the historical Nagarjuna. The two most extensive biographies of Nagarjuna, one in Chinese and the other in Tibetan, were written many centuries after his life and incorporate much lively but historically unreliable material which sometimes reaches mythic proportions. Nagarjuna was born a
Brahmin, which in his time connoted religious allegiance to the Vedas, probably into an upper-caste Brahmin family and probably in the southern Andhra region of India
(External Link
).
Iconography and hagiography
Nāgārjuna is often depicted in composite form comprising human and
naga characteristics. Often the naga aspect forms a canopy crowning and shielding his human head. The notion of the naga is found throughout Indian religious culture, and typically signifies an intelligent serpent or dragon, who is responsible for the rains, lakes and other bodies of water. In Buddhism, it's a synonym for a realized
arhat, or wise person in general. The term also means "elephant".
History
Very few details on the life of Nāgārjuna are known, although many legends exist. He was born in
South India, near the town of
Nagarjunakonda (నాగార్జునకొండ) in present day
Nagarjuna Sagar (నాగార్జునసాగర్) in the
Nalgonda district of
Andhra Pradesh. According to traditional biographers and historians such as
Kumarajiva (鳩摩羅什), he was born into a
Brahmin family, but later converted to Buddhism. This may be the reason he was one of the earliest significant Buddhist thinkers to write in classical
Sanskrit rather than
Pāli or
Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit.
From studying his writings, it's clear that Nāgārjuna was conversant with many of the
Nikaya school philosophies and with the emerging Mahāyāna tradition. However, affilitation to a specific
Nikaya school is difficult, considering much of this material is presently lost. If the most commonly accepted attribution of texts (that of
Christian Lindtner) holds, then he was clearly a Māhayānist, but his
philosophy holds assiduously to the non-Mahāyāna
canon, and while he does make explicit references to Mahāyāna texts, he's always careful to stay within the parameters set out by the
canon.
Writings
There exist a number of influential texts attributed to Nāgārjuna, although most were probably written by later authors. The only work that all scholars agree is Nagarjuna's is the
Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way), which contains the essentials of his thought in twenty-seven short chapters. According to Lindtner the works definitely written by Nagarjuna are:
- Mūlamadhyamaka-kārikā (Fundamental Verses of the Middle Way)
- Śūnyatāsaptati (Seventy Verses on Emptiness)
- Vigrahavyāvartanī (The End of Disputes)
- (Pulverizing the Categories)
- Vyavahārasiddhi (Proof of Convention)
- (Sixty Verses on Reasoning)
- (Hymn to the Absolute Reality)
- Ratnāvalī (Precious Garland)
- (Constituents of Dependent Arising)
- Sūtrasamuccaya
- (Exposition of the Enlightened Mind)
- (To a Good Friend)
- (Requisites of Enlightenment)
There are other works attributed to Nāgārjuna, some of which may be genuine and some not. In particular, several important works of esoteric Buddhism (most notably the
Pañcakrama or "Five Stages") are attributed to Nāgārjuna and his disciples. Contemporary research suggests that these works are datable to a significantly later period in Buddhist history (late eighth or early ninth century), but the tradition of which they're a part maintains that they're the work of the Mādhyamika Nāgārjuna and his school. Traditional historians (for example, the 17th century Tibetan Tāranātha), aware of the chronological difficulties involved, account for the anachronism via a variety of theories, such as the propagation of later writings via mystical revelation. A useful summary of this tradition, its literature, and historiography may be found in Wedemeyer 2007.
Lindtner considers that the
Māhaprajñāparamitopadeśa, a huge commentary on the Large Prajñāparamita not to be a genuine work of Nāgārjuna. This is only extant in a Chinese translation by
Kumārajīva. There is much discussion as to whether this is a work of Nāgārjuna, or someone else.
Étienne Lamotte, who translated one third of the Upadeśa into French, felt that it was the work of a North Indian
bhikkhu of the
Sarvāstivāda school, who later became a convert to the
Mahayana. The Chinese scholar-monk
Yin Shun felt that it was the work of a South Indian, and that Nāgārjuna was quite possibly the author. Actually, these two views are not necessarily in opposition, and a South Indian Nāgārjuna could well have studied in the northern
Sarvāstivāda. Neither of the two felt that it was composed by
Kumārajīva which others have rashly suggested.
Philosophy
Nāgārjuna's primary contribution to
Buddhist philosophy is in the further development of the concept of
śūnyatā, or "emptiness," which brings together other key Buddhist doctrines, particularly
anatta (no-self) and
pratītyasamutpāda (dependent origination). For Nāgārjuna, it isn't merely
sentient beings that are empty of
ātman; all phenomena are without any
svabhāva, literally "own-nature" or "self-nature", and thus without any underlying essence; they're
empty of being independent. This is so because they're arisen dependently: not by their own power, but by depending on conditions leading to their coming into
existence, as opposed to
being.
Nāgārjuna was also instrumental in the development of the
two-truths doctrine, which claims that there are two levels of truth in Buddhist teaching, one which is directly (ultimately) true, and one which is only conventionally or instrumentally true, commonly called
upāya in later Mahāyāna writings. Nāgārjuna drew on an
early version of this doctrine found in the Kaccāyanagotta Sutta, which distinguishes nītārtha (clear) and neyārtha (obscure) terms -
» By and large, Kaccayana, this world is supported by a polarity, that of existence and non-existence. But when one reads the origination of the world as it actually is with right discernment, 'non-existence' with reference to the world doesn't occur to one. When one reads the cessation of the world as it actually is with right discernment, 'existence' with reference to the world doesn't occur to one.
Nāgārjuna differentiates between (conventional) and paramārtha (ultimately true) teachings, but he never declares any to fall in this latter category; for him, even śūnyatā is śūnya--even emptiness is empty. For him, ultimately,
» |
||7
» The designable is ceased when the range of thought is ceased,
For phenomenality is like nirvana, unarisen and unstopped.
This was famously rendered in his
tetralemma with the logical propositions: X, not X, X and not X, neither X nor not X. "The designable is ceased when the range of thought is ceased" is the premise upon which the
Mindstream Doctrine is founded.
For more on Nāgārjuna's philosophy, see
Mūlamadhyamakakārikā.
English translations
Mulamadhyamakakarika
Other works
| Author |
Title |
Publisher |
Notes |
| Lindtner, C |
Nagarjuniana |
Motilal, 1987 [1982] |
Contains Sanskrit or Tibetan texts and translations of theShunyatasaptati, Vaidalyaprakarana, Vyavaharasiddhi (fragment),
Yuktisastika, Catuhstava and Bodhicittavivarana. A translation only
of the Bodhisambharaka. The Sanskrit and Tibetan texts are given
for the Vigrahavyavartani. In addition a table of source sutras is
given for the Sutrasamuccaya.
|
| Komito, D R |
Nagarjuna's "Seventy Stanzas" |
Snow Lion, 1987 |
Translation of the Shunyatasaptati with Tibetan commentary |
| Bhattacharya, Johnston and Kunst |
The Dialectical Method of Nagarjuna |
Motilal, 1978 |
A superb translation of the Vigrahavyavartani |
| Kawamura, L |
Golden Zephyr |
Dharma, 1975 |
Translation of the Suhrlekkha with a Tibetan commentary |
| Jamieson, R.C. |
Nagarjuna's Verses on the Great Vehicleand the Heart of Dependent Origination
|
D.K., 2001 |
Translation and edited Tibetan of the Mahayanavimsika and the Pratityasamutpadahrdayakarika, including work on texts from the cave temple at Dunhuang, Gansu, China |
| Lindtner, C. |
Master of Wisdom: Writings of the Buddhist Master Nāgārjuna |
Dharma, 1986 |
An excellent introduction to Madhyamika, Master of Wisdom contains two hymns of praise to the Buddha, two treatises on Shunyata, and two works that clarify the connection of analysis, meditation, and moral conduct. Includes Tibetan verses in transliteration and critical editions of extant Sanskrit.Tibetan Translation (product ID: 0-89800-286-9)
|
Further Information
Get more info on 'Nagarjuna'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://nagarjuna.totallyexplained.com">Nagarjuna Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |